Democrats Having Buyer’s Remorse on the Nuclear Option?

It was bound to happen sooner or later and now buyer’s remorse has finally caught up with the Democratic Party. Under the leadership of Senator Chuck Schumer, the Senate did away with the super-majority requirement for confirming a federal judge. They did that so that President Obama would not be obstructed by the GOP. It was called the Nuclear Option and blew away the old filibuster. Under GOP Leader Mitch McConnell, the option was expanded to include nominations to the Supreme Court. Now there are Democrats that are expressing regret. You can read their comments here.

As Written and Reported By Kevin Daley for the Daily Caller:

Too late!

take our poll - story continues below

Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?

  • Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Great American Republic updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Former Federal Prosecutor Says ‘Rosenstein Deeply Involved in Effort to Try to Remove Trump From Office’ (Video)

Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota said Sunday that her party should not have invoked the so-called nuclear option and abolished the legislative filibuster for judicial nominees.

The remarks come just before Judge Brett Kavanaugh will appear for confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Republican lawmakers expect Kavanaugh will be confirmed if he acquits himself well at the hearings.

“I would’ve liked to see 60 votes, no matter what the judge is,” Klobuchar told NBC. “I don’t think we should’ve made that change, when we look back at it. But it happened because we were so frustrated, because President Obama wasn’t able to get his nominees.”

But Klobuchar added that neither party is likely to reimpose the filibuster over judicial nominations, since doing so would cede a huge tactical advantage.

“I don’t think anyone’s going to want to hamstring themselves,” she said.

Democrats changed Senate rules in 2013 after a protracted Republican filibuster blocked three Obama nominees to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the court on which Kavanaugh sits. All three nominees, Judges Nina…..

KEEP READING THERE IS WAY MORE AT THE LINK BELOW:

As Kavanaugh Hearings Loom, One Senate Democrat Regrets Abolishing Filibuster | The Daily Caller

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.