In a bizarre action, a Democratic Party super PAC has filed Perjury Charges against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court. They claim that the Judge perjured himself in front of Congress way back in 2004 and/or 2007. To top that off they have filed these charges with the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, where it would be heard by none other than former Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland. They have missed a bunch of procedural issues that make all this just big noise. It is going nowhere. Here are all the reasons.
As Written and Reported By Emily Zanotti for the Daily Wire:
Well, okay, there are at least two big problems.
A group calling itself “The Democratic Coalition” “filed” what they called “perjury charges” with the Public Integrity Section of the U.S. Department of Justice, Saturday, claiming that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh committed perjury in his Senate confirmation hearings.
They were very excited about the charges, and even added that they planned to take the case directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, where it would be heard by none other than former Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.
The press release uses a lot of exclamation points.
🚨BREAKING: A criminal complaint and judicial ethics complaint are being filed against Kavanaugh for perjury in Congressional testimony — and LOOK WHO’S REVIEWING IT!
Happy Saturday, everyone!#MerrickGarland #CancelKavanaugh #StopKavanaugh #BlockBrett pic.twitter.com/fpZhqrz6QX
— Kristin Mink (@KristinMinkDC) September 8, 2018
There are a few problems. For starters, one can’t simply “file” perjury charges: that’s the U.S. government’s job in cases where someone may have intentionally lied under oath in a federal hearing. The U.S. attorney general typically does not follow up……
KEEP READING THERE IS EVEN MORE AT THE LINK BELOW:
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.