A Damning Indictment of Dianne Feinstein and Her Staff

Attorney Rachel Mitchell writes a report that winds up blaming the Democrats like Dianne Feinstein and her attorneys for helping Christine Blasey Ford write her story against Judge Brett Kavanaugh. In her fact-based assessment, prosecutor Rachel Mitchell concludes: “The activities of congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford’s attorneys likely affected Dr. Ford’s account.” Once you read through all these reasons to question her story you can then ask yourself was there actual collusion going on and was Ms. Ford controlled by handlers. Be sure and read through all the reasons to question the Ford account of events.

As Written and Reported By Ryan Saavedra for the Daily Wire: 

Rachel Mitchell, the prosecutor who questioned Christine Blasey Ford last week during a hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, wrote a five-page memo that was released on Sunday that outlines why she would not bring criminal charges against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

Trending: Failed Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton May Have Just Found a “New Job”

Mitchell’s memo notes nine significant problems with Ford’s testimony and underscores that her case is “even weaker” than a “he said, she said” case.

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Great American Republic updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“A ‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove,” Mitchell states. “But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”

Here are the nine problems outlined in Mitchell’s memo:

1. Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened:

  • In a July 6 text to the Washington Post, she said it happened in the “mid 1980s…….


Prosecutor Who Questioned Ford Shreds Her Case In Five-Page Memo | Daily Wire


You Might Like


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.